Country: Serbia
Closing date: 01 Sep 2016
Background:
The Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Unit of the Government of the Republic of Serbia and UNICEF in Serbia are launching the process of revising social inclusion and poverty reduction indicators, which will provide the basis for enhancing the framework for monitoring the social inclusion and poverty reduction process at the national and local levels in the Republic of Serbia.
In 2008, the Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Unit launched the process of defining a framework for monitoring social inclusion and poverty reduction in Serbia. Consequently, the study “Monitoring Social Inclusion in Serbia” was developed in 2009; the study defined a set of indicators for monitoring social inclusion and poverty reduction in Serbia, based on two pillars: the established European indicators and country-specific indicators.
An extensive consultative process coordinated by the Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction Unit in 2008 and 2009 resulted in the common agreement on and adoption of a list of indicators to monitor progress in the area of social inclusion under six dimensions of social inclusion and from two perspectives (the EU framework perspective and the country-specific perspective). The six dimensions of social inclusion used as the basis for reporting to date are:
financial poverty,
employment,
health,
education,
deprivation of basic needs (material deprivation),
social participation.
Following the study “Monitoring Social Inclusion in Serbia”[1], which contains an overview of the adopted indicators and provides an insight into the state of affairs in society, two reports on the status of social inclusion and poverty profiles in the Republic of Serbia were prepared.[2] The indicators used as the basis for reporting to date pertained to the national level only, while the definition and monitoring of social inclusion indicators at the local level was missing.
These activities were conducted in cooperation with the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, which regularly monitors and reports on the level of social inclusion in the country based on the set indicators[3].
Further, with UNICEF support, the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia introduced the practice of regular biannual updating of the social inclusion indicators in the DevInfo national database, starting from 2013[4].
After 2008, further development of indicators continued at the EU level. The need to continue the development of social inclusion indicators that would provide clearer indications of the changes in the status of the overall population, as well as its vulnerable portion, both adults and children, was also identified at the national level. Moreover, the need to measure, with a higher degree of precision and in a timely manner, the effects of measures and activities undertaken with a view to reducing social exclusion and poverty in the country, was recognised as well. One aspect of this need concerned clearer identification of local social inclusion and poverty levels.
The revision of the EU monitoring framework of 2006[5] and subsequent amendments of 2009[6] included the definition of primary or lead indicators and secondary or supporting indicators, while both primary and secondary indicators included defined sets of EU and country-specific indicators. In addition, reporting on overarching indicators and context information was introduced[7].
In the fulfilment of this assignment, the activities in which the Republic of Serbia participates in the capacity of a UN member state in pursuit of the global development goals should be taken into account. In September 2015, upon expiry of the period in which global development policies were guided by the Millennium Development Goals, the UN member states adopted a new global development agenda defined under 17 global Sustainable Development Goals[8]. The Republic of Serbia committed to aligning its development policies with the Sustainable Development Goals. Through this process, based on the 17 global goals, Serbia will set realistic national targets and define monitoring indicators. This process will be steered by the Government's Working Group formed in December 2015.
This assignment is launched in response to the need for a comprehensive update of the established indicators for monitoring social inclusion and poverty levels in the Republic of Serbia, notably in view of:
the new features in the EU framework for monitoring exclusion and poverty,
the UN framework for monitoring the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the need to cascade the set goals down to the national level,
other international frameworks (OECD, ILO etc.), as well as
the specific needs of the Republic of Serbia in the sphere of monitoring social inclusion and poverty levels, at both the national and local levels[9].
In accordance with the Guiding principles for the selection of indicators and statistics[10] defined at the EU level, the specific objective of this initiative is to set a revised list of social inclusion and poverty reduction indicators, in order that the indicator list would:
better reflect policy effect and impact on social inclusion and poverty reduction, at both the national and local levels,
clearly recognise the importance of each of the proposed indicators and its link to public policies,
facilitate the identification of changes in social exclusion levels within the country and identify changes in social equality and cohesion,
improve the understanding of changes taking place in these areas in the country and affecting the position of women and men, girls and boys living in it, as well as disadvantaged and vulnerable groups,
improve the timeliness, accuracy and availability of statistical reporting in the area of social inclusion and poverty reduction[11],
exert a long-term impact on improving the statistical foundations of reporting in the area of social inclusion and poverty reduction.
The dimensions under which the social inclusion and poverty reduction indicators in the Republic of Serbia are to be revised include:
financial poverty and resource distribution inequality,
employment,
health and long-term care,
education,
social protection and pensions,
deprivation of basic needs (material deprivation),
other welfare indicators, i.e. quality of life and social participation indicators.
Purpose of the assignment:
The purpose of the research is to conduct a research whose results will be used for the purpose of enhancing the framework for monitoring and reporting on the social inclusion and poverty reduction process in the Republic of Serbia**.** The specific objective is to set a list of relevant social inclusion and poverty reduction indicators under the identified dimensions, to be developed and monitored in the Republic of Serbia in the coming years.
For this purpose, a consultant or a group of consultants will be engaged by UNICEF for 4 out of 7 above listed dimensions, namely 1) health and long term care, 2) education, 3) social protection and pensions and 4) deprivation of basic needs.
This ToR is a basis for recruitment of a consultant for the dimension of pensions.
Estimated start Date:
September 2016
Estimated end Date:
30 November 2016
Number of days/months
12 days per dimension
Work Assignment Overview
Tasks
Deliverables
Timeframe
Conduct a more specific consultative process with the professional circles and interested community (minimum 5 meetings)
Report from consultative process
September 2016 (1,5 days)
Perform an analysis of the available social inclusion monitoring indicators and analyses relevant to the interpretation of indicators. Perform analysis of administrative data basis which could be employed in monitoring of social inclusion
n/a
October 2016 (3,5 days)
Prepare a draft narrative report and upon receiving comments from SIPRU and UNICEF Final narrative report according to the set methodology. Prepare a proposal for a list of indicators, accompanied by rationale for each indicator
Draft and final narrative report per dimension with the set of indicators
November 2016 (7 days)
Methodology:
Through this assignment, the process of revising indicators will be conducted using all available knowledge and the already developed reporting frameworks[12] as the foundation to be built on and updated to ensure improved coverage of social inclusion and poverty issues.
Under each dimension, in addition to the indicators that most directly pertain to the dimension, a set of context information should be developed as well. The context information list is defined in order to explain the indicators of the given dimension better and understand the national context and framework.
In the form of a narrative report, on the basis of the existing framework[13], the selected consultants are expected to propose methodological improvements including:
o improved reporting modality within the dimension,
o proposal for improving timely availability of indicators,
o proposal for improving indicator accuracy,
o proposal for monitoring the status of social exclusion and poverty reduction at the local level,
o critical review of changes and new features in reporting in the area at the EU level,
o proposal for alignment with selected new features in monitoring at the EU level,
o review of regional initiatives in monitoring the status of social exclusion and poverty reduction,
o proposal for alignment with the framework for monitoring the UN Sustainable Development Goals,
o a particularly valuable contribution is expected in proposing an improved modality of reporting on the status of specific population groups and the population living in severely unfavourable and/or specific conditions, which is mainly uncaptured by the regular statistical coverage (the Roma living in substandard settlements, children involved in living and/or working in the street, persons with disabilities, people residing in institutions etc.),
o proposals for improving the statistical foundations (defining new questions in the existing surveys, new modules in the existing surveys, or defining the need for new statistical reporting[14], as well as improvements in reporting on the basis of administrative data).
The narrative report per dimension in the Serbian language should be up to 10 pages in length.
Taking into account the findings of the narrative report, an indicator list should be developed under each dimension (according to the scheme below, to include both context indicators and indicators of the given dimension). As the final step, among all the indicators on the list, those to be considered overarching indicators should be proposed. A maximum of eight indicators under each dimension should be proposed for the overarching indicators set. Of the proposed eight, at least two should pertain to the local level. The number of indicators to be proposed under a dimension is not predefined.
Table 1. An illustrative presentation of a revised list of social inclusion and poverty reduction indicators
OVERARCHING INDICATORS
(the selected “key” indicators under each dimension, up to six from each dimension, may come both from among context indicators and from among direct indicators of the given dimension)
· national and
· local
Financial poverty and resource distribution inequality
Employmet
Health and long-term care
Education
Social protection and pensions
Deprivation of basic needs (material deprivation)
Welfare indicators, i.e. quality of life and social participation indicators
Indicators under each dimension are defined in accordance with the minimum set of methodological criteria for indicator selection, provided below.
Context indicators
Context indicators
Context indicators
Context indicators
Context indicators
Context indicators
Context indicators
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Direct indicators of the given dimension
(primary and secondary)
Table 2. For each of the proposed indicators, the following aspects should be stated:
EXPECTED COMPONENTS
EXAMPLE OF INFORMATION NEEDED
Indicator name
At risk of poverty rate by degree of urbanisation
Framework from which it originates (national, local, EU, UN. If taken from a strategic document, specify.)
EU framework
Indicator status (primary, secondary, context)
Primary
Indicator definition (short description)
The percentage of persons in the total population and in the relevant degree of urbanisation (basic SILC variable DB100) breakdowns who are at-risk-of-poverty. Key indicator(s) included in the dataset: People at-risk-of-poverty after social transfers (EUROPE 2020), At-risk-of poverty rate (60% of median income) + value of threshold (in PPP) (JAF)
Relevance of monitoring the indicator for decision-makers at the national and local levels, interpretation of the indicator from the policy perspective...
While the highest absolute number of people at risk of poverty and social exclusion is found in densely populated (urban) areas of the EU, poverty and social exclusion in thinly populated (rural) areas is a widespread phenomenon throughout the EU. Rural factors affecting poverty and exclusion include the neglect of social exclusion in rural areas by both policy makers and the public; a lack of social housing; car dependency and inadequate public transport; small workplaces associated with low pay and restricted careers; lack of unionisation or collective action of excluded groups; and strong personal networks. The reduction of the number of poor and socially excluded people in rural areas of the EU is crucial for the attainment of the EU2020 headline target.
Methodological and interpretation issues important for a thorough understanding of the indicator
The following degrees of urbanisation are considered:
· DEG1 (Densely populated area: At least 50 % lives in contiguous grid cells of 1km2 with a density of at least 1 500 inhabitants per km2 and a minimum population of 50.000)
· DEG2 (Intermediate density area: Clusters of contiguous grid cells of 1km2 with a density of at least 300 inhabitants per km2 and a minimum population of 5.000)
· DEG3 (Thinly-populated area: More than 50 % of the population lives in rural grid cells outside urban clusters)
Unit of measurement
Percentage of people in the total population
Indicator calculation
(= numerator/denominator)
*At-risk-of-poverty rate (ARPT) broken down by degree of urbanisation (ARPTat d urb) is calculated as the percentage of people in each group of degree of urbanisation (D_URB) who are at-risk-of-poverty (EQ_INC20[1]http://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Pracenje-drustvene-ukljucenosti-u-Srb...
[2] The first report, “Monitoring Social Inclusion in Serbia – Overview and Current Status of Social Inclusion in Serbia Based on Monitoring European and National Indicators” covers the period until 2009, and the other, “Monitoring Social Inclusion in Serbia – Overview and Current Status of Social Inclusion in Serbia Based on Monitoring European and National Indicators 2006-2012. Second Amended Edition” covers the period until 2012.
[3] http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/WebSite/repository/documents/00/02/06/80/PD10_084_engl_2015.pdf
[4] http://devinfo.stat.gov.rs/diSrbija/diHome.aspx
[5] European Commission, Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG, Portfolio of overarching indicators and streamlined social inclusion, pension, and health portfolios, Brussels, June 2006
[6] European Commission, Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG, Portfolio of indicators for the monitoring of the European Strategy for Social Protection and Social Inclusion – 2009 update, Brussels, September 2009
[7] The terminology used in the present document is consistent with that used in the EU. For more information, see European Commission, Social Protection Committee Indicators Sub-group, Portfolio of EU Social Indicators for the Monitoring of Progress Towards the EU Objectives for Social Protection and Social Inclusion, 2015 Update.
[8] https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
[9] Especially having in mind the Employment and Social Reform Program adopted by the Government, http://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/rs/usvojen-program-reformi-politike-zaposl%D1%98avanja-i-socijal...
[10] European Commission, Social Protection Committee, Indicators Sub-group, “Guiding principles for the selection of indicators and statistics”, downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=756&langId=en
[11] Not only by the Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia as the leading national institution involved in statistical reporting, but also by all complementary producers of relevant statistics – Batut Institute for Public Health, Republic Institute for Social Protection, Republic of Serbia Pension and Disability Insurance Fund, National Health Insurance Fund, National Employment Service and all line ministries in possession of data relevant to monitoring the social status of the Republic of Serbia's population.
[12] http://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Pracenje-drustvene-ukljucenosti-u-Srb...http://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Pracenje-stanja-socijalne-iskljucenos...
[14] Such as the Living Standards Measurement Survey, last carried out in 2007. This was the last time that reporting on the status of particularly vulnerable population groups (IDPs, refugees etc.) was possible with full methodological comparability with the reporting on the status of the general population.
How to apply:
Duration of the assignment is 12 working days from September 2016 to 30 November 2016.
The closing date for applications is 1 September 2016. Detailed Terms of Reference can be found on http://www.unicef.rs/oglasi-za-posao.html under Vacancies. Qualified candidates are requested to send their application to belgrade@unicef.org by 1 September 2016, ref. VN-39-A Consultants for social inclusion indicators for dimension: pensions
The application must include the following:
P11 (P11 form can be downloaded from http://www.unicef.org/about/employ/files/P11.doc)
Daily rate in RSD
Important note: Incomplete applications will not be taken into consideration.
Only short-listed candidates will be contacted. UNICEF is a non-smoking environment. UNICEF is committed to diversity and inclusion within its workforce, and encourages qualified female and male candidates from all national, religious and ethnic backgrounds, including persons living with disabilities to apply.